Skip to content

O'Reilly, Talbot & Okun

Engineering Blog

  • Home
» Posts Tagged "USTs"

Tag: USTs

Pending Reforms to Connecticut’s Underground Tank Cleanup Fund?

September 21, 2011 Paul Tanner

Federal law requires commercial underground storage tank owners and operators to demonstrate the financial ability to assess petroleum releases, take corrective action and cover third party liability. In 1991, the state Connecticut set up the Petroleum UST Reimbursement Fund to demonstrate financial ability for in-state UST owner/operators.  The financing mechanism used by the fund (and approved by the USEPA) is based a tax on motor fuel sales.   However, this program is now in trouble because the costs of UST cleanups has exceeded the income coming into the fund.

The UST Fund is staffed by 13 Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) employees, who review and process claims, and then make payment recommendations to the UST Review Board.  The UST Fund board provides checks and balances on disbursements to keep the system honest. With current annual revenues from the motor fuel sales tax amounting to about $340 million, it seems there should be enough financing to support a robust cleanup program.  As anyone waiting for reimbursement from the fund can affirm, payments have dragged out to the point where the reimbursement program has lost any shred of credibility.

The sad reality is that the State Legislature has decreased UST Fund allocations to insufficient levels. For 2012 and 2013, just $500,000 has been allocated to the UST Fund, the remaining $679.5M that should have been available to the Fund has been diverted to the General State Fund. Currently there is a backlog of $14M in approved claims and $70M of submitted claims awaiting approval. Small wonder then that in July EPA put the state of Connecticut on notice that it may withdraw its approval of the UST Reimbursement Fund as a viable financial responsibility mechanism.

Not one to back away from a challenge, new DEEP Commissioner Daniel Esty held a public meeting on September 2 in Hartford to begin a dialogue on repairing to the UST Reimbursement Fund. While the meeting was short on details, it was comforting to know that DEEP has heard the message from the regulated community and the EPA.  DEEP is expected to call a second public forum during the last week of September and is planning to seek about thirty volunteers from business, industry and government to staff three focus groups.  Each focus group will be assigned the task of assessing one of these issues: 1) Looking Backward – how to pay $84M backlog of approved or submitted claims in a challenging economy; 2) Looking Forward – how to address new spill claims and the on-going budget problem; and 3) introducing incentives and efficiencies in the process. You can be sure the Commisioner will impose a tight schedule for the focus group reports.

From first-hand experience we believe Commissioner Esty means business. In this new initiative, thirty smart people will tackle a long-standing problem of developing a successful management approach for this important environmental protection program. We are optimistic that the renewed attention will lead to positive changes that will resolve the payment backlog and help protect Connecticut’s environment.

Connecticut Cleanup Program, Environmental Site Assessment, Uncategorized Connecticut Underground Storage Tank Reimbursement Account, Remediation, USTs Leave a comment

Recent Posts

  • There’s No Place like Home – Part 3
  • Pyrrhotite Destroys My Home’s Foundation – Part 2 – The Insurance Company
  • My Pyrrhotite in Concrete Story (Part 1)
  • PCBs and Orcas: Are PCBs Really Decimating the Ocean’s Killer Whales?
  • Why is Chlorine in My Waste Oil?

Archives

  • May 2020
  • October 2019
  • July 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • June 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011

Categories

  • Big Thoughts
  • Coal Tar
  • Connecticut Cleanup Program
  • Environmental Site Assessment
  • Geotechnical
  • Health and Safety
  • Mass Contingency Plan (MCP)
  • PCBs in Schools
  • PCBs not in Schools
  • PCE Toxicity
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized
  • Vapor Intrusion

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Powered by WordPress .Theme: Oner by Webulous Themes